<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Wild Hunt &#187; King Arthur</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wildhunt.org/blog/tag/king-arthur/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wildhunt.org/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:01:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Quick Note: Doing Something About Stonehenge</title>
		<link>http://wildhunt.org/blog/2009/05/quick-note-doing-something-about-stonehenge.html</link>
		<comments>http://wildhunt.org/blog/2009/05/quick-note-doing-something-about-stonehenge.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 14:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Paganism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[King Arthur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standing stones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stonehenge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wildhunt.org/blog/?p=2899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a confluence of events, including high-profile protests, a public consultation, and the looming influx of Olympics visitors, the British government has approved a new visitor centre and a road closure to improve the Stonehenge site.
&#8220;Britain has given the go-ahead for a new 25 million pound visitor centre at Stonehenge and will shut a road [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a confluence of events, including <a href="http://wildhunt.org/blog/tag/king-arthur">high-profile protests</a>, a <a href="http://www.stonehengeconsultation.org/">public consultation</a>, and the <a href="http://www.london2012.com/">looming influx of Olympics visitors</a>, the British government has <a href="http://www.canada.com/travel/Britain+burnishes+image+Stonehenge/1592383/story.html">approved a new visitor centre and a road closure</a> to improve the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stonehenge">Stonehenge</a> site.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;Britain has given the go-ahead for a new 25 million pound visitor centre at Stonehenge and will shut a road that runs alongside the country’s most famous prehistoric monument &#8230; The Stonehenge Programme Board (SPB) has now given approval “in principle” for a new visitor centre to be built at Airman’s Corner about 1.5 miles (2.4 km) from the current site. In addition, it has proposed closing the A344 road which takes traffic very close to the stones. The project will now need planning approval and funding, which will come from both private and public sources.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>No doubt this newly-approved plan could unravel if funding isn&#8217;t found, but I can&#8217;t imagine the government would balk at improving this <a href="http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/373">World Heritage Site</a> and risk international embarrassment. Whether these developments will please <a href="http://wildhunt.org/blog/tag/king-arthur">Druid leader King Arthur Pendragon</a>, who is risking arrest by camping out in front of the site, remains to be seen. However, it certainly is good news for anyone (including Pagans) who care about the sites future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wildhunt.org/blog/2009/05/quick-note-doing-something-about-stonehenge.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Local Council Decides to Kick Out King Arthur</title>
		<link>http://wildhunt.org/blog/2009/04/local-council-decides-to-kick-out-king-arthur.html</link>
		<comments>http://wildhunt.org/blog/2009/04/local-council-decides-to-kick-out-king-arthur.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Paganism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CoBDO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Druid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Druidism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Druidry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Druids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[King Arthur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standing stones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stonehenge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wildhunt.org/blog/?p=2820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Telegraph, Guardian, BBC, Salisbury Journal, and Daily Mail all report that Druid leader King Arthur Pendragon (no, not that Arthur Pendragon) has been given notice by authorities to vacate his position in front of Stonehenge by May 3rd or face prosecution for trespassing. Pendragon (the Druid formerly know as John Rothwell) has been living [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/5232178/King-Arthur-evicted-from-Stonehenge.html">Telegraph</a>, <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/apr/28/stonehenge-pagan-protest">Guardian</a>, <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/wiltshire/8022291.stm">BBC</a>, <a href="http://www.salisburyjournal.co.uk/news/4323919.Druids_in_defiant_mood_despite_court_order/">Salisbury Journal</a>, and <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1174009/Protester-called-King-Arthur-finally-gets-marching-orders-10-month-live-protest-Stonehenge.html">Daily Mail</a> all report that Druid leader <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Uther_Pendragon">King Arthur Pendragon</a> (no, not <em>that</em> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_Arthur">Arthur Pendragon</a>) has been given notice by authorities to vacate his position in front of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stonehenge">Stonehenge</a> by May 3rd or face prosecution for trespassing. Pendragon (the Druid formerly know as John Rothwell) has been living in a camper at the edge of the site for the last 10 months <a href="http://wildhunt.org/blog/2008/07/what-to-do-about-stonehenge.html">protesting issues of access, lack of upkeep, and long-promised improvements.</a></p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;[King Arthur Pendragon] believes visitors should be allowed to walk close to the stones and touch them rather than being confined to a visitor centre and a pathway well away from the monument. Pendragon also believes the fence designed to keep visitors out has a damaging impact on the stone circle itself, holding it &#8220;in a stranglehold like a snared animal&#8221;. Wiltshire county council launched legal proceedings to force Pendragon to move away. Salisbury crown court granted a possession order, in effect giving him until Sunday to pack up and leave. But outside court, bearded Pendragon, who was flanked by supporters in white robes, said he would not be budging.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Pendragon has already vowed to fight the issue in court and to stay in his camp despite threat of arrest. The Druid leader also <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/5232178/King-Arthur-evicted-from-Stonehenge.html">claims to have the full support</a> of the <a href="http://www.cobdo.org.uk/">Council of British Druid Orders</a> (though it is unknown <a href="http://wildhunt.org/blog/2009/01/getting-to-the-gossip-or-splitters.html">how much support among modern Druidry</a> that really entails). There are certainly British Pagans <a href="http://archaeopagans.blogspot.com/2008/06/what-we-stand-for.html">who do not support the idea of allowing unfettered access to Stonehenge</a>, especially considering the damges that were inflicted on the site leading up to imposed restrictions in the 1970s. Meanwhile, while Pendragon kept his vigil, British beuracracy continued to slowly trawl forward in finding a solution to Stonehenge&#8217;s issues. Specifically the now-published and approved proposal from the <a href="http://www.stonehengeconsultation.org/">Future of Stonehenge Public Consultation</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;Although the Government decided that the A303 road improvements were unaffordable, it has made a commitment in December 2007 to review the <a href="http://www.stonehengeconsultation.org/whsplan.html">Management Plan</a> as the overarching strategic document for the Site, and to complete <a href="http://www.stonehengeconsultation.org/environmentalimprovements.html">environmental improvements</a> at Stonehenge, including new visitor facilities, in time for the 2012 Olympics. This work includes examination of the case for closing the A303/ A344 junction to improve the setting of Stonehenge. A new Stonehenge Project Board, chaired by the Ministers for Culture and for Transport, has been set up to oversee this work.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>While Pendragon&#8217;s stance may be noble and heroic, it is far more likely that <a href="http://www.london2012.com/">the impending 2012 Olympics</a> will finally spur the government to make the needed improvements in order to avoid international embarrasment over the state of a <a href="http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/373">World Heritage Site</a>. Still, you simply can&#8217;t buy the kind of publicity that gets you listed in all the major British newspapers, so I suppose this is something of a PR coup for Pendragon and his followers. Whether anything constructive will come of this limelight remains to be seen, but having raised the stakes it&#8217;s jail or go home now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wildhunt.org/blog/2009/04/local-council-decides-to-kick-out-king-arthur.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting to the Gossip, or, Splitters!</title>
		<link>http://wildhunt.org/blog/2009/01/getting-to-the-gossip-or-splitters.html</link>
		<comments>http://wildhunt.org/blog/2009/01/getting-to-the-gossip-or-splitters.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Paganism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Archaeology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CoBDO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CoBDO WEST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Druidry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Druids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[King Arthur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Davies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEBBLE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reburial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[splitters!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wildhunt.org/blog/?p=2428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes you learn more by reporting the gossip than you do by merely stating the facts. For instance, last week a story appeared about a British Druid demanding the reburial of a 4000-year-old skeleton on religious grounds. What that article didn&#8217;t tell you was that Paul Davies, the man supposedly speaking for The Council of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes you learn more by reporting the gossip than you do by merely stating the facts. For instance, last week a story appeared about a British Druid <a href="http://www.thisisbath.co.uk/news/old-skeleton-reburied/article-628118-detail/article.html">demanding the reburial of a 4000-year-old skeleton</a> on religious grounds. What that article didn&#8217;t tell you was that Paul Davies, the man supposedly speaking for <a href="http://www.cobdo.org.uk/">The Council of British Druid Orders</a>, is actually <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1127430/Druid-wars-How-drunken-row-4-000-year-old-bones-causing-chaos-pagan-circles.html">leading a small splinter group calling itself CoBDO West.</a></p>
<blockquote><p><em>The ‘row’ concerns a small breakaway group of druids (known to some as COBDO West) who’ve requested the museum release the remains so they can rebury them where they came from. King Arthur and mainstream COBDO want the same thing — but are upset that COBDO West have taken matters into their own hands. ‘COBDO West are just a joke — three men and a dog, without even the dog,’ splutters King Arthur.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Further sniping between <a href="http://www.cobdo.org.uk/">CoBDO</a> and CoBDO West <a href="http://www.gazetteandherald.co.uk/news/1164290.druids_call_for_burial/">can be seen in the comments section of this article.</a> And yes, I too instantly thought of <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gb_qHP7VaZE">the &#8220;splitters&#8221; scene from <em>Life of Brian</em></a>. Needless to say, other British Pagan and Druid groups <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1127430/Druid-wars-How-drunken-row-4-000-year-old-bones-causing-chaos-pagan-circles.html">are increasingly embarrassed</a> by the public fighting.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>‘A lot of people are embarrassed by it all — very embarrassed,’ says Emma Restall Orr, a druidic teacher and priestess from Warwick-shire. ‘They’re feisty, burly lads who are very much on the edge of druidism but are rowing in public and giving druids a bad name.’</em></p></blockquote>
<p>It should also be noted that neither CoBDO nor CoBDO West speak for all British Pagans or Druids on the issue of reburial and archeology. <a href="http://www.pebble.uk.net/index.html">PEBBLE</a> (The Public Bodies Liaison Committee for British Paganism), and the related group <a href="http://www.honour.org.uk/node">HAD</a> (Honouring the Ancient Dead), are pursuing <a href="http://www.honour.org.uk/faq#n23">a more nuanced course</a> that acknowledges the need and importance of archaeological study.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>HAD is not declaring one policy in terms of action. HAD&#8217;s focus is to ensure that there is discussion, consultation and shared decision-making around ancient human remains. In this way, all interested parties, including local communities and Pagans, will be heard when it comes to human remains (ancestors) exhumed within their landscape, ensuring that the spiritual, religious and social value of these remains is presented alongside any scientific, monetary or political value discerned by those funding or carrying out that excavation.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>One important voice of dissent on the reburial issue  is <a href="http://stroppyrabbit.blogspot.com/search/label/ancient%20dead">fellow Pagan blogger Yewtree</a>, who is a member of <a href="http://archaeopagans.blogspot.com/">Pagans For Archeology</a>. Check out the article <a href="http://www.honour.org.uk/node/64">&#8220;Finding a Compromise &#8211; Keeping Places&#8221;</a> for some of her views on the subject (<a href="http://www.sacredsites.org.uk/reports/reburial.html">an article by Jenny Blain and RJ Wallis is also worth a look</a>). As for the warring CoBDO&#8217;s, <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1127430/Druid-wars-How-drunken-row-4-000-year-old-bones-causing-chaos-pagan-circles.html">they may soon find themselves left behind</a> by a modern Druidry that doesn&#8217;t want to be associated with punch-ups at the pub and media stunts.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Terry Dobney has been a druid for 50 years and has been Chief Druid and Keeper of the Stones at Avebury for the past 11. He wears long white robes and an antler on his belt, clasps a hazel staff and has a rook’s feather in his cap. ‘Druids are supposed to have a balanced view and see both sides of the argument,’ he explains. ‘But there are some strong egotistical characters who need keeping in check. We’re drawing up a code of conduct for being a druid.&#8217;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Looks like some &#8220;egotistical characters&#8221; better watch out before they are seen <a href="http://wildhunt.org/blog/2008/08/living-god-in-red-bathrobe.html">in the same light as Kevin Carlyon</a>, and become leaders of nothing more than a fancy acronym.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wildhunt.org/blog/2009/01/getting-to-the-gossip-or-splitters.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What to Do About Stonehenge?</title>
		<link>http://wildhunt.org/blog/2008/07/what-to-do-about-stonehenge.html</link>
		<comments>http://wildhunt.org/blog/2008/07/what-to-do-about-stonehenge.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 12:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Druidism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Druidry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Druids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[King Arthur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paganism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standing stones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stonehenge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wildhunt.org/blog/2008/07/what-to-do-about-stonehenge.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Though the Summer Solstice revelers have moved on, that most famous of British neolithic monuments, Stonehenge, remains in the news. First off, somewhat controversial Druid leader King Arthur Pendragon (no, not that Arthur Pendragon) is camping out near Stonehenge, and vows to continue to do so until long-promised improvements to the site are made.John Rothwell, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though <a href="http://canadianpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5gr7lVHixjx_osLgLXtZwDPNTyWQQ">the Summer Solstice revelers have moved on</a>, that most famous of British neolithic monuments, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stonehenge">Stonehenge</a>, remains in the news. First off, somewhat controversial Druid leader <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Uther_Pendragon">King Arthur Pendragon</a> (no, not <i>that</i> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_Arthur">Arthur Pendragon</a>) is <a href="http://www.thisissalisbury.co.uk/display.var.2372205.0.druid_in_stonehenge_protest.php">camping out near Stonehenge</a>, and vows to continue to do so until long-promised improvements to the site are made.<br /><center><br /><img src="http://www.wildhunt.org/uploaded_images/art9-741527.jpg"><br /><small>John Rothwell, aka Arthur Uther Pendragon.</small><br /></center><br /><i>&#8220;Demonstrating on behalf of the Council of British Druid Orders, King Arthur Pendragon, has been camping close to the World Heritage site since the Summer Solstice on June 21. Pendragon, 54, is hoping his protests will encourage the Government to remove the fences around the monument, build a tunnel over the A303 and grass over the A344. He said: &#8220;That&#8217;s what they promised to do but the Government said they couldn&#8217;t afford the tunnel. &#8220;It&#8217;s too commercialised. We want something exactly like Avebury. Those fences have been here since 1978.&#8221; &#8230; He said: &#8216;The visitor centre, set up 14 years ago, was supposed to be a temporary building. It&#8217;s awful. It is a national disgrace so what I am hoping to do by my protest is embarrass the Government into raising the issue.&#8217;&#8221;</i></p>
<p>However, this outrage over the condition of Stonehenge isn&#8217;t isolated to Druids and Pagans, and with <a href="http://www.london2012.com/">the Olympics coming to London in 2012</a>, there has been increased pressure to improve the state of <a href="http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/">England&#8217;s heritage sites</a>. One manifestation of this willingness to do something about the state of Stonehenge is <a href="http://www.stonehengeconsultation.org/">an upcoming three month public consultation on the future of the site.</a> Organizers are no doubt hoping that this period of public input will quell criticisms of governmental negligence, <a href="http://www.bdonline.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=725&#038;storycode=3117097&#038;c=2">and spur renewed action.</a><br /><center><br /><img src="http://www.wildhunt.org/stonehenge.jpg"><br /><small>Stonehenge</small><br /></center><br /><i>&#8220;English Heritage is to launch a public consultation to find a new site for its long-planned Stonehenge visitor centre. The news comes more than six months after it scrapped Denton Corker Marshall’s design for a centre. That scheme, which had been granted planning permission in December, was shelved after the government decided not to fund a £500 million A303 tunnel. Heritage Lottery Funding had been conditional upon the tunnel going ahead. Denton Corker Marshall won a competition to design the facility in 2001 after EH had ditched a previous scheme by Edward Cullinan Architects. From July 15, members of the public will be able to offer feedback on EH’s review of the World Heritage Site Management Plan, and proposed environmental improvements to the roads around the monument, as well as possible locations for the new visitor facilities.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Perhaps the fear of worldwide embarrassment over the care of Stonehenge will do more to motivate renewed care and attention to the monument than any protesting Druid could ever hope to achieve. In the meantime, King Arthur camps, and we wait to see if the government and <a href="http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/">English Heritage</a> can finally find a long-term solution for the site&#8217;s care and maintenance.<br />
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wildhunt.org/blog/2008/07/what-to-do-about-stonehenge.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
