To Pardon or Not to Pardon (the Witches)
The New York Times profiles Debra and Addie Avery, a mother and daughter who made the news recently for their quest to have Connecticut exonerate the men and women convicted of witchcraft during the 17th century. The article tells how the Averys, who are descended from convicted witch Mary Sanford, were met with an usual amount of hostility over what seemed to be a simple matter.
What passed for due process back then.
“Soon, the Averys’ lobbying attracted the support of other descendants of those who were accused. But critics spoke out, too, lashing out on Internet blogs. Ms. Avery was shaken to read the harsh comments, which reminded her of the mob frenzy that her ancestor faced. ‘The world has changed, but people haven’t,’ she said. Addie said she got a new education when she decided to publicly defend her ancestor. To her mother’s amazement, the attacks didn’t bother the suddenly thick-skinned teenager. ‘There are worse things than mockery,’ Addie said. ‘Now, I’m not afraid to stand up when I see something wrong.’”
A syndicated column by Warner Todd Houston (with the oh-so-clever title of “Take Your Apology And…”) seems to encapsulate the kind of “harsh comments” received by the Averys.
“We have a busy body mother and wife who is wasting the time of everyone around her over her faux outrage about something that happened in a long lost age … This is the same sort of faux outrage we see from black Americans who want “apologies” or even reparations for slavery … There ain’t any witches being persecuted by the state in 2008 … You should apologize for wasting our time and the tax money used to fund the government that wasted its time on your silly resolution. And you should apologize for forcing us all for taking time away from important matters.”
Despite the idealogical resistance to exonerating innocent people, a watered-down resolution, which merely calls the judgments “shocking”, and that no stigma should be attached to their descendants was introduced. It failed to win passage. An outcome that shouldn’t be very surprising, since lawmakers never took this resolution seriously, as evidenced by transcripts from the resolution hearings on the matter.
“REP. LAWLOR: You know … this morning, I remembered this great scene from Monty Python, where they grabbed the witch. And if you Google it, if you Google “Monty Python witch trial,” you get to see that scene. There’s–
DEBRA AVERY: Yes, about the wood and how wood floats, and, yeah, I’m very familiar with that.
REP. LAWLOR: But as funny as it is, it gives you a sense of, you know, looking back, how outrageous it really was because, it’s something.”
I’d state that this may be the first time Monty Python has been referenced in a resolution hearing, but I’m sure I would be wrong.
Is it important to exonerate people accused of witchcraft 300 years ago? While the Averys aren’t Pagan (that I know of), the issue has become a somewhat contentious one within the modern Pagan community. Some modern Witches feel a sort of spiritual kinship with those persecuted as “witches” hundreds of years ago (a sentiment that has also been attached to modern “witch-trial” victims), others assert that since these men and women weren’t practicing any sort of faith that we would now call Paganism, we should feel no special connection to these “witches” (other than sympathy for the lack of real justice given to them).
No matter where one comes down on the issue, it is strange how much hostility and scorn can be released over a resolution that would ultimately cost taxpayers little, and in no way negatively affect anyone’s current lifestyle. Is it the idea of an apology? That it involves “witchcraft”? Whatever the reason, perhaps with real-live witch-killings and persecutions happening right now in places like Africa, India, and Saudi Arabia it wouldn’t be such a bad idea to definitively exclaim that what we did then was barbaric and wrong. That these trials were the mistakes of a fearful and superstitious populace, and the men and women convicted were innocent of the supernatural crimes they were accused of.
If we cling to their convictions in this enlightened age, what sort of message does that send to governments and communities who are repeating our mistakes?
3 responses so far
Not to be flippant about the witch trials, but, I have to admit she could do worse than Python’s as a source. With Terry Jones’ background as a medievalist, as well as his studies in folklore, his projects almost always have great historical content and commentary.
“It’s a fair cop.”
Sunday’s NYT has an article about witchcraft persecution of children today in Nigeria. Children were imprisoned at Salem, and minors are imprisoned at Guantanamo. See a link to how fundementalist preachers are stirring up hate in Africa using theology taught by missionaries-
http://kmareka.com/?p=1786
My wife is a Witch, and I practice the craft myself, and we do this openly, with no shame, with no “stigma”. This is only possible due to the protections afforded us by the constitution, and our willingness to force the issue that this document protects us with equal ferver as any religious person or institution. That being said, I can only say that whatever happened in the past, it sure as hell isn’t going to happen again without a damn good fight. I personally will take as many “witch-hunters” with me as I can before they take ME down. Yep, just like Mr Heston said, they will pry my religious freedoms from my cold, dead fingers.