<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paganism and Polyamory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wildhunt.org/blog/2007/06/paganism-and-polyamory.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wildhunt.org/blog/2007/06/paganism-and-polyamory.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:05:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt Stone</title>
		<link>http://wildhunt.org/blog/2007/06/paganism-and-polyamory.html/comment-page-1#comment-956</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Stone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 13:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wildhunt.org/blog/2007/06/paganism-and-polyamory.html#comment-956</guid>
		<description>It should be noted that whilst Mormons are often equated with Christian fundamentalism, they have strayed far beyond the &quot;fundamental&quot; Christian teaching of monotheism, and actually owe more to the esoteric community than they or the esoteric community generally like to admit. I&#039;d say they are &quot;fundamentalist&quot; more in terms of social dynamic than in terms of doctrine. More patriarchal sure, but non monotheistic in their own way. I think the link between polytheism and polyamory potentially applies to them too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should be noted that whilst Mormons are often equated with Christian fundamentalism, they have strayed far beyond the &#8220;fundamental&#8221; Christian teaching of monotheism, and actually owe more to the esoteric community than they or the esoteric community generally like to admit. I&#8217;d say they are &#8220;fundamentalist&#8221; more in terms of social dynamic than in terms of doctrine. More patriarchal sure, but non monotheistic in their own way. I think the link between polytheism and polyamory potentially applies to them too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracie</title>
		<link>http://wildhunt.org/blog/2007/06/paganism-and-polyamory.html/comment-page-1#comment-953</link>
		<dc:creator>Tracie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 22:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wildhunt.org/blog/2007/06/paganism-and-polyamory.html#comment-953</guid>
		<description>Not something I am interested in and not something I even want to promote, quite frankly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not something I am interested in and not something I even want to promote, quite frankly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.229 seconds -->
