<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Editing Out the Paganism?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wildhunt.org/blog/2007/06/editing-out-paganism.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wildhunt.org/blog/2007/06/editing-out-paganism.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:29:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paloma</title>
		<link>http://wildhunt.org/blog/2007/06/editing-out-paganism.html/comment-page-1#comment-984</link>
		<dc:creator>Paloma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 21:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wildhunt.org/blog/2007/06/editing-out-the-paganism.html#comment-984</guid>
		<description>I found it interesting Jason that you used the term &quot;sanitize&quot; twice to describe what will be done to the story.  Did you mean to play on the Christian point of view?  Because otherwise I think that a Pagan referring to it this way is kind of describing the world in Christian terms, you know?  Like, acknowledging that there might be something &quot;dirty&quot; needing &quot;sanitization.&quot;  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Perhaps I&#039;m sensitive to it coming from a Feminist background that is sensitive to language usage, etc, but I think that without appearing petty, we can refer to this as what it is- damaging and removing authentic/essential elements?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found it interesting Jason that you used the term &#8220;sanitize&#8221; twice to describe what will be done to the story.  Did you mean to play on the Christian point of view?  Because otherwise I think that a Pagan referring to it this way is kind of describing the world in Christian terms, you know?  Like, acknowledging that there might be something &#8220;dirty&#8221; needing &#8220;sanitization.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Perhaps I&#8217;m sensitive to it coming from a Feminist background that is sensitive to language usage, etc, but I think that without appearing petty, we can refer to this as what it is- damaging and removing authentic/essential elements?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.239 seconds -->
