<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The &quot;pagan&quot; view of AIDS?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wildhunt.org/blog/2006/12/pagan-view-of-aids.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wildhunt.org/blog/2006/12/pagan-view-of-aids.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:29:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Card-Table Gypsy</title>
		<link>http://wildhunt.org/blog/2006/12/pagan-view-of-aids.html/comment-page-1#comment-697</link>
		<dc:creator>Card-Table Gypsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 02:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wildhunt.org/blog/2006/12/the-pagan-view-of-aids.html#comment-697</guid>
		<description>I find after reading the interview that I have serious questions about how accurately the director&#039;s words are being transmitted.  The editing is atrocious, with spellings like &quot;Buddah&quot; suggesting no one even bothered with a spell-checker.  Words are just flatly misused, though who actually is responsible for that is anyone&#039;s guess (A disease cannot be &quot;derisive.&quot;  It can, however, be &quot;divisive,&quot; and context suggests strongly that that was the intended word.).  Pass the salt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find after reading the interview that I have serious questions about how accurately the director&#8217;s words are being transmitted.  The editing is atrocious, with spellings like &#8220;Buddah&#8221; suggesting no one even bothered with a spell-checker.  Words are just flatly misused, though who actually is responsible for that is anyone&#8217;s guess (A disease cannot be &#8220;derisive.&#8221;  It can, however, be &#8220;divisive,&#8221; and context suggests strongly that that was the intended word.).  Pass the salt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://wildhunt.org/blog/2006/12/pagan-view-of-aids.html/comment-page-1#comment-695</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 23:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wildhunt.org/blog/2006/12/the-pagan-view-of-aids.html#comment-695</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;He&#039;s kidding, right? Is diabetes spread through sex? I don&#039;t think so.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;No, diabetes isn&#039;t spread through sex - but it &lt;i&gt;can&lt;/i&gt; be developed as a result of overeating and leading a sedentary lifestyle. From the ultra-Christian perspective, that&#039;s gluttony and sloth, two mortal sins. So, in theory, and using the same logic as why fundies are attacking the &#039;sinfulness&#039; of HIV, the fundies should have been all over diabetes from the beginning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>He&#8217;s kidding, right? Is diabetes spread through sex? I don&#8217;t think so.</i></p>
<p>No, diabetes isn&#8217;t spread through sex &#8211; but it <i>can</i> be developed as a result of overeating and leading a sedentary lifestyle. From the ultra-Christian perspective, that&#8217;s gluttony and sloth, two mortal sins. So, in theory, and using the same logic as why fundies are attacking the &#8217;sinfulness&#8217; of HIV, the fundies should have been all over diabetes from the beginning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hecate</title>
		<link>http://wildhunt.org/blog/2006/12/pagan-view-of-aids.html/comment-page-1#comment-692</link>
		<dc:creator>Hecate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 20:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wildhunt.org/blog/2006/12/the-pagan-view-of-aids.html#comment-692</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I really wanted to know why AIDS has been derisive and pushed people apart. Diabetes never caused people to call God&#039;s intentions into question or blame people for getting it, but this disease did.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;He&#039;s kidding, right?  Is diabetes spread through sex?  I don&#039;t think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I really wanted to know why AIDS has been derisive and pushed people apart. Diabetes never caused people to call God&#8217;s intentions into question or blame people for getting it, but this disease did.</i></p>
<p>He&#8217;s kidding, right?  Is diabetes spread through sex?  I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://wildhunt.org/blog/2006/12/pagan-view-of-aids.html/comment-page-1#comment-691</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 19:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wildhunt.org/blog/2006/12/the-pagan-view-of-aids.html#comment-691</guid>
		<description>Yeah, sounds like he was trying to make a point but ran out of religions that would fit the perspectives he had created so he created one that he called Pagan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, sounds like he was trying to make a point but ran out of religions that would fit the perspectives he had created so he created one that he called Pagan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.258 seconds -->
