Paganism = Antisemitism?
Harun Yahya (a “prominent Turkish intellectual”) writing for the Media Monitors Network tries to convince his readers that antiSemitism is contrary to Islam. How does he do this? By blaming Paganism!
“A basic fact that must be appreciated about antisemitism is that it is a pagan creed that no Muslim could ever espouse.”
Now wait. Doesn’t he mean ‘pagan’ in the irreligious, modern secular society sense? Surely he isn’t talking about actual pre-Christian religion. Yes he is, and don’t call me Shirley.
“All these various [Middle-Eastern] civilizations have had their prophets who proclaimed the existence and the unity of God and made His commands known. But when we examine recorded history, we see that Indo-European peoples from ancient times always believed in paganism. The Greek and Roman civilizations, the Teutons, Vikings and other Barbarian peoples living in southern Europe at that time were all polytheistic pagans. For this reason, these communities remained completely without moral guidance. Violence and savagery were regarded as praiseworthy; homosexuality and adultery were widely practiced. (The most important historical representative of Indo-European civilization was the Roman Empire, and we must not forget that it was a savage society that delighted in seeing people torn apart in the arenas.) These peoples who ruled Europe encountered monotheism through Jesus Christ, a prophet sent to Semitic people. Sent as a prophet to the children of Israel, the teaching of Jesus spread throughout Europe in the course of time and all the formerly pagan peoples gradually accepted Christianity.”
Wow! Good thing we all converted. But wait! The dread spectre of antiSemitism would rise again through Neo-Paganism!
“…a strange current of thought circulated in Europe: Neo-Paganism. The leaders of this movement claimed that European societies must reject Christianity and return to ancient pagan beliefs. According to the adherents of Neo-Paganism, the way European societies understood morality in ancient pagan times (i.e., a warlike, pitiless, bloodthirsty, unbounded barbarous morality), was much superior to the morality they adopted when they accepted Christianity (i.e., a humble, compassionate, peace-loving and religious morality).”
So it was only a matter of time before we started hating Jews! How logical!
“The adherents of Neo-Paganism were hostile to Christianity; at the same time, they adopted a great hatred for Judaism which they saw as the source of Christianity. Indeed, they saw Christianity as the disseminator of Jewish ideas throughout the world and regarded it as a kind of Jewish plot. So, this Neo-Paganism, on the one hand incited hostility against religion and, on the other, gave birth to fascism and antisemitism. Especially when we look at the foundations of the Nazi ideology, we can see clearly that Hitler and his confreres were, in fact, pagans.”
Again with the “Hitler was a Pagan” thing. Is this guy hanging out with the Pope? This writer has so much love to give (as long as you only believe in the right big-G God).
“Islam is a religion of peace, love and tolerance. Today, however, some circles have been presenting a false image of Islam, as if there were conflict between Islam and the adherents of the two other monotheistic religions. Yet Islam’s view of Jews and Christians, who are named “the People of the Book” in the, is very friendly and tolerant.”
Because as we all know the “People of the Book” have never sought to harm Jews or wage Crusades or vilify eachother or wage wars or terror. It was all the Pagans fault after all. Thanks goodness! Now the monotheists can sleep with a clear conscience knowing that a proper scape-goat for their sins has been found.
ADDENDUM: Richard Bartholomew points out in the comments that Harun Yahya is among other things a Holocaust denier.



