Quick Notes: Glastonbury Thorn Cut Down, Jim Morrison Pardoned, and Mundane Goat Heads

Jason Pitzl-Waters —  December 10, 2010 — 40 Comments

A few quick news notes to start your weekend.

Glastonbury Thorn Cut Down: The town of Glastonbury in England, a place held as special and holy to both Pagans and Christians, suffered a tragedy yesterday as vandals cut down the Holy Thorn tree on Wearyall Hill. The tree was a place of pilgrimage, and thought to be planted there by Joseph of Arimathea (the uncle of Jesus).

Photo by Matt Cardy / Getty Images

Police are trying to establish a motive for the attack, in which vandals hacked off the branches of the tree, leaving only part of the trunk remaining. They have not ruled out a religious motive. Katherine Gorbing, director of Glastonbury Abbey, said: “The vandals have struck at the heart of Christianity. Like the whole town, we are shocked and appalled.”

So far, no one is sure why vandals attacked the tree. Some claim it could have been done by some sort of neo-Puritans, hearkening back to the Cromwellian “Roundheads” who cut down the original tree during the English Civil War, other think it might be due to the recent collapse of Crown Currency Exchange (the owner of Wearyall Hill is a major stockholder in the company). Whatever the case, this is a tragedy to those who love the history, tradition, and unique atmosphere of Glastonbury. One can hope the tree will be replaced by a surviving off-shoot, the perpetrators caught, and the wounds healed over time.

Jim Morrison Pardoned: The late Dionysian rocker/poet Jim Morrison has been pardoned of his 1970 indecent exposure charges by outgoing Florida governor Charlie Crist, calling the conviction a “blot” on his record. This move was blasted by Morrison’s widow, author and  Celtic Pagan Patricia Kennealy Morrison.

The pardon isn’t enough for Patricia Kennealy Morrison, who says she married Morrison in a ceremony that was never made official. She wanted the convictions expunged and called the pardon “a complete cheap, cynical, political ploy.” “I have a real problem with the semantics of a pardon. The pardon says that all his suffering and all that he went through during the trial, everything both of us went through, was negated,” she said [...] Kennealy Morrison said Morrison’s convictions led to his demise, and that of the band. She said he felt like he “had been made a scapegoat of the counterculture movement.”

The issue of a pardon has been something of a debate among Doors fans, with some preferring a more raucous image of the singer. For many Pagans Morrison has become “the 20th Century incarnation of Dionysus,” complete with rituals done in his honor.

Goat Heads That Aren’t Occult: Three homes in Cincinnati had severed goat heads placed on their door-steps, but for once it isn’t being blamed on practitioners of Santeria, Satanists, or occult practitioners.

“Police currently do not believe there is any kind of occult connection. “Usually when satanic or cult worshipers do this kind of thing they leave a mark they want you to know exactly what, who and why this was done,” said [Cincinnati Police Detective Charles] Zopfi. Police interviewed all three families to see if they are connected in some way and so far the answer is no. “Right now it could be anything from a teenage prank to a very nasty prank to somebody who is just targeting these people for a specific reason and right now we don’t know why,” said Zopfi.”

Gold star to Detective Zopfi for not rushing to judgment, or falling for those horrid “training videos” for “occult crime.” Now if only more law enforcement and animal control officials would follow suit.

That’s all I have for now, have a great day!

Jason Pitzl-Waters

Posts

  • Lori F – MN

    I'm glad the authorities aren't blaming pagans. It would be so easy for them. After all it's a Christian site.
    Why does Jim Morrison need a pardon? It didn't ruin his career, did it?
    Hurrah for the Cincinnati police for not jumping to conclusions.

    • sarenth

      *shakes head* This is…just a tragedy to come close to losing a holy tree. I hope they catch and prosecute whoever did that to the full extent of the law.

      As for the goat heads, same there.

    • stillhere1966

      After the incident, a large number of Doors concerts were canceled because of it.

      Does the pardon mean Morrison can come out of hiding now? ;-)

  • Baruch Dreamstalker

    In the video clip a reporter noted none of the families are "ethnic minorities," which is probably why there was no suggestion of Santeria.

  • http://blog.chasclifton.com Chas S. Clifton

    Since she is the self-appointed Custodian Priestess of Jim Morrison's memory, I would expect a grumpy reaction from Patricia.

    • lysana

      And on top of that, the nonsense claim she's his widow. They weren't legally married. His legal widow by common-law marriage is dead, and her death was what triggered Patricia's more grandiose claims.

      • Baruch Dreamstalker

        I thought they were handfasted. That at least ought to earn her points among Pagans.

        • lysana

          I would only give that "points" if his wife had consented to the union. She didn't. He also was quoted as saying it didn't mean that much to him. So it's a one-sided marriage, which is no marriage at all to me.

          • stillhere1966

            How would a common law wife, someone who has nothing on paper, be in any position to consent or not? Patricia Kennealy has more legitmacy to be called hiis wife. He and she at least chose to perform a ceremony.

            As for it not meaning much to Morison, well, while he might have been a great lyricist and a singer, he was also a major asshole and pretty much abused everyone around him.

            What he said after the fact is hardly gernain. He made a conscious choice to undertake the ceremony with Kennealy, no one forced him. That's more than he ever did with Courson.

            Also, since it's pretty obvious Courson played a significant part in his death, one can argue she wasn't there for him when he needed her the most and therefore hardly deserves the privilege of being considered his spouse after his demise.

            Pamela Courson has been dead since 1974.

          • leea

            I know Patricia slightly. She has never been anything but nice to me…it interests me that she seems to inspire so very much invective all these years after Jim Morrison's death. Who really knows what the truth is/was? Patricia is, however, a very talented author. I have enjoyed her Keltaid series, and she has branched out into mysteries set around a rock-n-roll 60's theme.

            If it is important to her to defend Jim's legacy, more power to her. I try to remember to look at that era through the lense of the society they were part of-liberal, unshackled by what they saw were societies chains and fallacies.

        • http://blog.chasclifton.com Chas S. Clifton

          They were handfasted, yes. She believes that the Craft ceremony was the more real marriage. She wrote about their relationship for one of the Llewellyn Witchcraft Today volumes that I edited about 15 years ago. Llewellyn editors rejected her chapter but you may read it here.

          • stillhere1966

            Interesting piece. She seems very full of herself.

  • Pitch313

    Whoever did it, for whatever motivation, cutting up the Thorn tree was nasty and hurtful. From what I've been reading, there is a practice in place of re-growing cuttings and bits of root in place. The Thorn tree will most likely continue through those.

    I like to think that Jim Morrison, wherever he may be these days, doesn't give a damn for any pardon. But I'm pretty sure that he was a singer in a band, a rock band, not a deity come to take us away. I'm also sure that, back then, plenty of people did want to obliterate the "counterculture" in all its forms.

    • Baruch Dreamstalker

      A lot of them still want to…

  • A.C. Fisher Aldag

    Here is hope that people root many cuttings, and it comes back as a thorn HEDGE. :-)

    • TheL

      That would be so cool! A whole row of thorns!

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=667952307 Jennifer Parsons

        Heh. An axis mundi that is essentially one big middle finger to vandals. Someone needs to make this happen!

  • Pat Mathews

    I think searching for a religious motive – an iconography, if you will – is barking up the wrong tree. How about yahoos doing it because vandalism is more entertaining than not doing vandalism? The gods know there are enough of that sort everywhere.

    • http://www.facebook.com/stenobauer Cathryn Bauer

      Yes, and the court reporter certainly knows that, too (sigh). I also doubt a religious motive and suspect that looking for one is overthinking the problem. It's a fact that destroying things and making a lot of people unhappy is a power trip for some. My first thought was that it sounded like an act that emerged from generalized contempt and anger for the world at large and the Glastonbury community in particular, perhaps from someone in hard circumstances.

      I think, though, that the Thorn will live and thrive in a new iteration, simply because it always has and because there is such support for doing whatever is necessary to help this along. The human connection with particular trees is not to be underestimated! I live in a small town about 45 east of San Francisco whose center is a huge oak tree. It is a local tradition to put post celebratory greetings ("Happy 12th birthday, Ashley!") on the tree. About ten years ago, it was found to be seriously ill, and no expense was spared to prop it up and bring it back to some sort of health. The tree is the main feature of the town's logo. I think the Thorn is an important symbol for all, and I know that around the world, many of us will be working for its healing.

      • http://www.facebook.com/stenobauer Cathryn Bauer

        Two things in response to my own post. That's 45 miles east of SF, not 45 whatever. And I forgot to add that the oak tree connection is all the more remarkable in that this is a notably conservative community. I doubt that a half-dozen people in this town even know what Ogham is, but the connection to that oak tree is universally profound.

  • Pat Mathews

    I quote Kenneally's article, "From his death until today, Jim Morrison has been seized and appropriated by the legions of those who know no joy, apparently, unless they are feeding off the creative and karmic energy of those they never knew in life–would have been afraid, indeed, to know in life; in the process reinventing those lives to their own needy specifications–specs that have (surprise!) little or nothing to do with how things actually were."

    Has anybody thought to point out to her how much this resembles HER?

  • Rombald

    Re – the thorn. It could be vandalism. It could be getting at the owner. It could be something occult (trying to steal the energy, or something??) It could be some sort of atheist extremist group.

    However, my bet is on Evangelicals, trying to piss off Anglicans, Catholics, Pagans and New-Agers, all at the same time.

    • Bookhousegal

      Not a bad bed, these days, really, …If you're looking for motives, Glastonbury Tor and all is a rare and prominent example of a place where, being dear to both Pagans and lots of Christians in a way that seems pretty harmonious.

      Of course with all that's going on in the UK right now, there's a lot of anger turned right at the aristocracy and royals, with the austerity cuts and particularly what they do to the education system: one thing that strikes me about this is that they didn't cut the tree nearer the base, that really seems to argue for 'Making a point:' someone wanted the 'ruin' to be *visible,* If there was an 'occult' aspect directed that way, it was either very smart and/or very stupid, I lean to think. It's kind of not necessary for that aspect to have been there in the minds of the vandals, but it's pretty obvious there's civil unrest there right now.

      Could indeed just be cover for some self-appointed Stonekillers, anti-Catholics, anti-aristocracy, etc sentiments and there we are.

      • http://pallasrenatus.blogspot.com Pallas Renatus

        I'm still a bit numb over the Thorn. I can't imagine a motive for such an act.

  • http://www.paganhistory.com A.J.

    Cutting down any tree is horrible, and to destroy something on holy grounds is even worse. But, hasn't religion done that for years? Destroy what they don't agree with. Wasn't there a commandment? "Though Shalt Not Kill"? Yet, if it's for our country, then……….. no problem. Go ahead and destroy what ever you like. UGH!

    • Baruch Dreamstalker

      Actually, "Thou shalt not kill" is a mistranslation. A better translation is "Murder shall not be done." Murder is a much more restricted category than killing, and does not include war fighting.

      • kauko

        "Murder shall not be done" sounds too awkward a translation for 'lo tir?a?'. 'You shall not commit murder' sounds find to me (although 'murder' may only be the closest the English language has to the notion of r-?-?). It literally says something like 'You do not murder' but in Biblical Hebrew putting 'lo' before the second person qal imperfect usually means a strict prohibition or forbidding.

        • Robin Artisson

          Murder is concealed and/or unlawful killing within the boundaries of one's society and laws. It doesn't mean you can't sail down the coast or walk over the mountains and slaughter foreign people. It means you can't do that to your tribesmen without your people's own legal justification. Hardly a high moral stance for "god".

          • kauko

            You're correct that r-?-? seems to refer only to illegally killing your tribesmen (at least the Koehler Baumgartner 'Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament' agrees with that assessment). Of course, if you do go elsewhere and kill someone you will likely have to face justice at the hands of those people.

          • Robin Artisson

            Yes, but evading that justice still marks you as "righteous" back home. Understand that I'm not against local and situational ethics, nor even against the tribal scale of ethics or morality- trying to foist a "universal" morality onto mankind moves (as we have seen) rapidly in the direction of monotheism. What we need isn't a universal sense of morality, but a broader sense of "community", perhaps. In our inter-connected world, it only makes sense. But this isn't an invitation to reduce all cultures to some contrived common denominator.

          • Bookhousegal

            Well, Robin:

            ""trying to foist a "universal" morality onto mankind moves (as we have seen) rapidly in the direction of monotheism.""

            Maybe inasmuch as that is often the context of the 'trying to foist.'

            It's possible however, in pluralistic contexts, to establish 'rules of war' and other things you could call 'universal morality, between tribes and even cultures: the key concept there is *agreement.* The United States herself is supposed to be premised on this sort of notion, and even in the question of 'killing' 'murder' 'war,' these agreements usually exist in some way or another: things tend to escalate when these agreements, tacit or otherwise, are breached.

            It happens on many levels: there are conventions for interactions between groups: sometimes to the point that war itself becomes ritual or symbolic: cross those lines, say, by harming a child, commonly, using mustard gas, etc, and all bets are off.

            Monotheism commonly actually does these things backwards: saying, 'By not being of our religion, you're inherently breaking any rules, so we can do whatever atrocities we plese.'

            It has everything to do with honor, and why sudden culture clashes can turn horrible even at times when people have other intentions.

            The specifics vary widely, never mind constitute inherent universal absolutes, but these things happen all the time and in fact are the basis of many potentially-hostile interactions between competing powers and groups.

            Also why asymmetrical warfare or other provocation often deliberately breaks those codes: it's an archetype that goes back to Achilles, at least: there's honorable fights, but kill my 'child,' and all bets are off, (even if the Gods still say some things just ain't honorable, and it of course never goes well.)

            The Iliad's full of stuff like that: and it's part, I think, of why the Roman Republic and by extension/comparison we, trace our lineage back to Aeneas, as exiles from the ruin such breaches bring, in fact bringing the few treasures and starting something based, one hopes, on the very notion of such agreements (And a renewal of those, in terms of 'consent of the governed and our early foreign policies especially. Most especially in *not* being in any way 'based on the Christian religion,' in that treaty on the shores of Tripoli: *because* so doing has always meant claiming 'Divine right of kings to judge,' and our founding fathers had just *left* that movie.

            There *can* be sorts of 'universal morality,' …. but they cannot be 'foisted.' We, the people, in this case of the world, simply must *agree* on them. And where that agreement fails, we hopefully restore it before various Ilia burn. :)

  • http://www.facebook.com/stenobauer Cathryn Bauer

    Re the pardon — snort. I heard a very interesting interview with Ray Manzarek in which he said emphatically that the alleged exposure never happened, that Morrison told the crowd in the heat of the moment that he would do this, but it didn't actually take place. More on that here: http://www.wbur.org/npr/131960761/what-really-hap

    I think it's appalling that authorities of the time and in that place were not already giving this version of events serious consideration. Hyped-up crowds are very suggestible, something that law enforcement and prosecution should be well aware of. The whole sad business resulted in the cancellation of numerous concerts and the inevitable winding-down of the Doors. What more great music might the world have if this hadn't happened?

    I view the pardon with great cynicism. I think it makes a few people who behaved badly feel better and accomplishes nothing at all beyond that.

    • stillhere1966

      Cops are not the brightest people to begin with. They're basically someone from the lower class who managed not to get a criminal conviction that would disqualify them for the job.

      Florida is the sleazy part of the bible belt.

      By 1969, the whole counter culture was starting to turn ugly. The establishment people were beginning to have the realization that we had been lied to and we were losing in Vietnam. They were beginning to suspect everything they had been told and believed in, had been a lie.

      There was probably enough cannabis smoke there to make anyone present have a serious contact high. If you told them what that saw, that was what they believed they saw.

      This was not a good time or place for Morrison to be playing mind games and pissing people off. He was lucky he wasn't put up against a wall and shot while 'trying to escape.'

      • harmonyfb

        Cops are not the brightest people to begin with. They're basically someone from the lower class who managed not to get a criminal conviction that would disqualify them for the job.

        Wow. The bigotry inherent in that statement is staggering.

        1. The implication that the 'lower class' is full of stupid criminals. Poor does not equal stupid or criminal. For that matter, a lack of intelligence does not equal criminal behavior, either.

        2. That police officers are stupid. Police officers are – as a general rule – pretty damn smart. The training is rigorous, and the situations they find themselves in require split-second decision-making and the ability to quickly read tone, body language, etc. They must learn laws, and learn to apply those laws in a context which may or may not be textbook. They often serve as unofficial counselors for wayward youth and folks in dispute.

        3. That police officers come from one segment of society (that which is looked-down-upon by you.) They do not. Even in my own family, there are a myriad of backgrounds represented. I have four police officers in my close and extended family – one is from an upper-economic class family, two were small businessmen with agricultural backgrounds, and one was a soldier from a working-class background. Two of the four were college-educated. I'm also acquainted with other police officers, both of whom were college-educated.

        4. That police officers are somehow different than the population they serve. They aren't. They run the gamut of economic class, education, political leaning, religion, temperament, and race. Some are nice people, some are jerks. Some are conciliatory, some have big mouths and bad attitudes. Like other humans, they sometimes fall victim to their own prejudices and stereotype entire groups of people.

        • http://www.facebook.com/stenobauer Cathryn Bauer

          Thank you very much for your thoughtful post. Absolutely every statement you have made about law enforcement is true in this court reporter's very considerable experience.

      • http://www.facebook.com/stenobauer Cathryn Bauer

        I really have to contest that statement that "cops are not the brightest people to begin with." I work with them nearly every day. (Court reporter, one of those people with the funny machines like in "Judgment at Nuernberg.") It's a fact that there are good and bad people in each and every profession. And beyond that, in this era of budget cuts, law enforcement agencies are often underequipped and understaffed, something often not taken into consideration. There have been numerous occasions in courtrooms when I have been writing away at my steno machine and been very glad to see that a deputy had stepped up alongside me. When I hear a nasty generalization such as you have made about "cops," generally the first response that comes to mind is the deputy who refused to let a trial proceed until there another deputy available to sit between me and a witness who was in custody for a violent crime. When I witnessed an act of child assault in a courthouse restroom, who came running at my first call and got the process ofintervention going? Surprise, it was one of those very individuals you have so wrongly mischaracterized in your post.

        And you are absolutely wrong that they are "lower class." (I abominate your characterization of ANYONE in the tone you took, but that's really another topic.) Law enforcement personnel come from all levels of society — my personal acquaintanceship suggests that middle-class suburbia is the most common — and they have to be well-educated and articulate since they deal with diverse populations. A surprising number of officers in our county are bi- and multilingual. One of the few generalizations that I am very comfortable making with regard to law enforcement is that today's officers are to a person very interested in technology that helps them do their job more effectively. An example of this would be the auto-theft prevention system LoJack. This past fall, I reported pretrial hearings in a case where a Highway Patrol officer located a stolen vehicle that was equipped with it. The LoJack indicator went off in his car, he gave chase, and the upshot was a lot more than a college student getting her stolen car back undamaged within 72 hours of loss; ultimately, a car theft ring was broken off and about a half-dozen arrests made.

        There is just so much you don't know about law enforcement. Please concede this and stop talking in such a hateful and generalized way. I just wish you could have been present when a deputy described to me the worst moment of his career to me which had been about 15 years previously. He had to take charge of a five-year-old girl when her drug-addicted mother, a waitress who frequently served him on his dinner breaks, contacted him with the news she had decided to surrender the child to county services. He argued with that mother for two hours in a parking lot, taking the child only when the mother declared repeatedly that if he didn't take her daughter, the child would be abandoned right there. He brought the child to an emergency shelter and stayed with her for several hours through a medical exam and other intake procedures. Fifteen years later, this officer was still shaken and disturbed while talking about it.

        There is so much more I could say about police officers, and no, not all of the stories are positive. But I will say flatly that even as I sharply criticize the investigating officers and the District Attorney's Office in the matter of Morrison's case, there is absolutely no way I can subscribe to even one of the assertions you have made in your post.

  • A.C. Fisher Aldag

    Whoever cut down the Glastonbury Thorn is gonna get majorly plagued by all of the spiritual entities that lived there. A lifetime of his / her car not starting, losing keys, hair tangled, legal papers in disarray, etc. Poor tree. Poor spirits. ;-( Well, the thorn has grown back from a stump before and might again. Thorns are hardy.

  • Ursyl

    I'm hoping the tree can grow back from what is left. I've seen more than a few stumps sprouting branches up from the roots in my life.

  • Bookhousegal

    Yah. And it's a *thorn.*

    Way to cheese off just about everyone and everything on the island except for neo-Puritans and a couple of Hitchens groupies.

    Bon appetit. :)

  • http://www.walkofthefallen.com Labrys

    Likewise my hope. Unlike conifers, which do die if the top branch section is lopped off, most deciduous trees sprout new branches quite readily from the top of the severed trunk.