Why The Empire Fell

Jason Pitzl-Waters —  December 15, 2006 — 1 Comment

Comic Book Resources features a short excerpt from a longer editorial by writer Alan Moore (writer of Promethea, V for Vendetta, and worshiper of a possible hand-puppet) concerning pornography for the magazine Arthur. In the article Moore details the history of imagery and stories meant to titillate, and their importance to civilization.

“In bygone Greece we see a culture plainly unperturbed by its erotic inclinations, largely saturated by both sexual imagery and sexual narratives. We also see a culture where these attitudes would seem to have worked out quite well, both for the ancient Greeks and for humanity at large. They may well have been hollow-eyed and hairy-palmed erotomaniacs, but on the plus side they invented science, literature, philosophy and, well, civilization, as it turns out.”

So where did it all go wrong? Well, in the opinion of Moore, Christianity and the shaming of sex influenced by such thinkers as the Apostle Paul.

“Sexual openness and cultural progress would seem pretty much to have walked hand in hand throughout the opening chapters of the human story in the West, and it wasn’t until the advent of Christianity, or more specifically of the apostle Paul, that anybody realized we should all be thoroughly ashamed of both our bodies and those processes relating to them. Not until the Emperor Constantine had cut and pasted modern Christianity together from loose scraps of Mithraism and the solar cult of Sol Invictus, adopting the resultant theological collage as the religion of the Roman Empire, did we get to witness the effect of its ideas and doctrines when enacted on a whole society.”

This massive social experiment, in Moore’s opinion, eventually brought about the fall of the Roman Empire.

“If we take a traditional (and predominantly Christian) view of the collapse of Rome, then conventional wisdom tells us that Rome was destroyed by decadence, sunken beneath the rising scum-line of its orgies, of its own sexual permissiveness. The merest skim through Gibbon, on the other hand, will demonstrate that Rome had been a heaving, decadent and orgiastic fleshpot more or less since its inception. It had fornicated its way quite successfully through several centuries without showing any serious signs of harm as a result. Once Constantine had introduced compulsory Christianity to the Empire, though, it barely lasted for another hundred years.”

In his view, this compulsory conversion experience destroyed the syncretic and (mostly) religiously tolerant (for its time) society of Rome. Specifically, it hurt the recruitment of foreign military who didn’t wish to toe the new religious line making Rome weak to invasions by barbarians. Moore’s conclusion?

“…sexually open and progressive cultures such as ancient Greece have given the West almost all of its civilizing aspects, whereas sexually repressive cultures like late Rome have given us the Dark Ages.”

It should be interesting it read the entire article to hear Moore’s views on the tension between libertine excesses and repressive shame in our modern era. It seems that no happy balance has yet to be struck. With one side often losing its own compass with issues regarding the degradation of women, and the other so worried about homosexual sex that it sees such impulses as demonic possession and pure evil.

Send to Kindle

Jason Pitzl-Waters

Posts

  • Planet W

    Hello,I think this is a thoughtful article and, assuming that the historical references I’m not certain of check out, it’s a great theory. Where the writer loses me is at the end. There is not a dichotomy between a libertine faction that produces pornography on the one hand, and fundamentalists who are terrorized by anything Queer (and strive to crush it) on the other. Rather, they are part of the same thing. There is nothing sexually liberal about pornography (difficult as it is to define the word, let’s assume we know what we mean). Porn is the natural result of repression, just like the hatred of gay and lesbian people is. They are the same product with the same function: the expression of, or an outlet for, repressed sexual desire. One beats on women; the other largely on men. In this respect they are identical.The problem we face, though, if we want to create a tolerant society (and very few people do, particularly those who find safety in fear), is that we must tolerate everything, at least to the point of being able to address it.If we ban porn, we also walk into the trap of banning the forms of sexual speech that would allow the freedoms we seek, including this very discussion. We would ban the imagery that would show us there is another way to portray sexuality visually or in writing. There is no easy answer except to hold the space for the discussion open, which is actually not so easy, but at least it’s possible.Eric Francishttp://planetwaves.net/